Tag Archive 'Federal Bureau of Investigation'

Apr 29 2008

Profile Image of Wwonka
Wwonka

Sharpton: Judge’s Decision An ‘Abortion Of Justice’

 

"Sharpton: Judge’s Decision An ‘Abortion Of Justice"

You can read that story of the Sean Bell Verdict Here.

My Question is why anyone listens to this Racist ScumBag Al Sharpton?
Al Sharpton is all that and More, Does anyone Remember Tawana Brawley?

In November of 1987, a 15-year-old girl named Tawana Brawley was found in upstate New York, covered with feces and racial slurs written in charcoal. Brawley, who is black, claimed to have been abducted and raped by six white law enforcement officers.

Sharpton took up Brawley’s cause and defended her refusal to cooperate with prosecutors, saying that asking her to meet with New York’s attorney general (who had been asked by Gov. Mario Cuomo to supervise the investigation) would be like "asking someone who watched someone killed in the gas chamber to sit down with Mr. Hitler."

According to the Associated Press, Sharpton and Brawley’s lawyers asserted "on 33 separate occasions" that a local  prosecutor named Steven Pagones "had kidnapped, abused and raped" Brawley. There was no evidence, and Pagones was soon cleared. Sharpton then accused a local police cult with ties to the Irish Republican Army of perpetrating the alleged assault.

 

 

More on the Resulting Lawsuit against Al Sharpton. The Fact of the Matter is That everything that comes out of this Race Baiting Shyster is designed to inflame and Offend.

He should be in Jail since AL Sharpton was BUSTED: Caught on an FBI Surveillance Tape Discussing a Cocaine Deal and how to launder the proceeds of said deal.

So why is it we give any credence to anything that comes out of This Blowhards mouth?

 

Peace

The Donkey Show

No responses yet

Oct 04 2007

Profile Image of Wwonka
Wwonka

How Potheads can Help To Build a Better America

Filed under MJ, Reefer, Reefer madness, madness, pot

Potheads Help To Build a Better America


Potheads Help To Build a Better America
Posted by CN Staff on October 02, 2007 at 06:51:07 PT
By Jeff Ackerman
Source: Union

California — So one guy is dead and another is in a hospital with bullet holes after a reported weekend shoot-out near North San Juan over some pot. You know … the green, leafy substance one out of every 10 doctors says will ease your pain faster than a pill-popping Rush Limbaugh could shout, “Liberal Potheads!”
Enough of the reefer madness already. I know a friend-of-a-friend’s-friend who smoked pot once or a thousand times, and he never once put a cat in a microwave or shot heroin into his big toe.

In fact, the only way you’d ever know he enjoys his pot is if you looked in his pantry and saw the 1,000 packs of Oreos and 500 jars of Costco jumbo peanut butter.

My pot-smoking (sometimes he eats it with milk and cookies) friend-of-a-friend’s-friend doesn’t look like someone the FBI would bother pursuing.

Not with Osama bin Laden still on the loose and federal agents still wondering what happened to the guy who jumped out of a jet plane with millions of dollars and a parachute. The pothead I know is semi-retired, has snow-white hair and goes to bed by 9 p.m., mostly, I suspect, because he eats too much pot and gets tired.

Just so you know, there is a BIG difference between pot and … say … crank. All you need do is compare the user profiles.

A typical pothead is generally:

1. Mellow.
2. Not an early riser.
3. Casual dresser (buttons can be problematic).
4. Romantic (hence the late mornings).
5. Weight-challenged (there is no Oreo/peanutbutter diet).

A typical crankhead, by comparison, is generally:

1. Hyper (they can vacuum an entire block in one hour).
2. An early riser (mostly because they never sleep in the first place).
3. Romantic (at least until their teeth fall out).
4. Casual dresser (they eventually sell their wardrobe to pay for the crank).
5. Weight-challenged (they sell all of their Oreos and Peanutbutter to the potheads and get very skinny).

And before any of you start suggesting that a pothead eventually becomes a crankhead, stop. It’s not true. Lots of potheads have never tried crank and lots of crankheads have never tried pot. The government wants us to believe that because it allows them to continue to trade pot for oil. That’s right, Americans.

My friend’s-friend’s-friend says he heard about the government plot from a guy he buys Oreos from at WalMart. He says that all that pot the DEA guys take from the farms around North San Juan goes straight to Washington, D.C., where they grind it up into a boatload of brownies and ship it to Saudi in exchange for a few barrels of oil. As you know, it’s hard to grow pot in the desert, even with all the heat, and those sheiks like to kick back on those giant floor pillows listening to Michael Jackson’s greatest hits.

How else can you possibly explain why the federal government keeps putting heat on the potheads and their crops that could, if taxed properly, fund parks, roads, schools and a gigantic crankhead rehab center? That’s right, Americans, potheads helping crankheads, in cooperation with the FBI and Internal Revenue Service.

And if we can finally decriminalize pot we won’t need to keep building prisons to house potheads and their suppliers. Last time I checked, they were stacking inmates six high at San Quentin and paying the guards $100,000 per year, with medical benefits and an unlimited supply of rubber gloves.

According to one estimate, the state spends $160 million per year to arrest, prosecute and imprison marijuana offenders. Our prisons house around 173,000 people today, and seven of every 10 of them we release eventually wind up behind bars again. Yet the state is about to spend another $7 billion or so to build new prisons and add new beds. This at a time when our schools could use some money and our medical-care costs are out of reach for many families. What’s wrong with this picture?

They also estimate that taxes from pot sales could generate as much as $3 billion per year.

“Yes … but won’t that lead to more pot use?” you ask once again. I don’t think so. Why would every single Californian start smoking pot when they have pain pills, booze and Viagra? Besides, half the fun is breaking the law.

One thing I’m fairly certain of is this: If pot were legal today, one guy would probably still be alive and another would probably not be in a hospital with bullet holes in his skin.

Jeff Ackerman is the publisher of The Union. His column appears on Tuesdays.

Source: Union, The (Grass Valley, CA)
Author: Jeff Ackerman
Published: October 2, 2007
Copyright: 2007 The Union
Contact: letters@theunion.com
Website: http://www.theunion.com/

__________________

No responses yet

Oct 02 2007

Profile Image of Wwonka
Wwonka

Filed under Uncategorized

10 Million Americans Busted for Pot
Posted by CN Staff on October 01, 2007 at 08:54:51 PT
By Paul Armentano, AlterNet
Source: AlterNet

USA — What would cops do without weed? For one thing, they’d sure spend a lot less time arresting and processing petty pot violators. How much time? For starters, however long it took to bust the estimated 739,000 Americans arrested for minor pot possession in 2006.
That’s according to the FBI’s Uniform Crime Report, which reported last week that a record 829,625 Americans were arrested for violating marijuana laws last year. Of those arrested, 89 percent of those were charged with simple pot possession — the highest annual total ever recorded and nearly three times the number of citizens busted 15 years ago.

Yet to hear local law enforcement spin it, busting small-time potheads isn’t their priority. The record number of busts, they claim, is simply a reflection that record numbers of Americans are now smoking pot.

But don’t tell Drug Czar John Walters that. After all, the czar just claimed earlier this month — at a press conference announcing the release of the federal Office of Applied Studies (OAS) 2006 National Survey on Drug Use and Health — that pot use has been declining for the better part of the past five years.

Predictably, both the cops and the drug czar are playing fast and loose with the facts. Yes, in fact more Americans are now admittedly consuming pot today than in 1991 (so much for the past 15 years of the so-called “war on drugs”), but this increase is hardly proportional to the dramatic spike in overall pot arrests.

As for Walter’s comments, while the survey did indeed report a minor decline in adolescents’ self-reported use of pot, it further reported a minor uptick in the total number of Americans who report using marijuana regularly, from 14.6 million in 2005 to 14.8 million in 2006.

Of course, a less than 2 percent increase in pot users from ‘05 to ‘06 doesn’t explain why pot arrests jumped more than five percent from a then-record 786,545 to today’s total. Or why the overall number of annual pot arrests has gone up every consecutive year but two for the past 16 years.

Perhaps the explanation is two-fold. It’s plausible that the federal government is — and always has — greatly underestimated the number of Americans who use pot. (Does anyone really believe that cops are busting — on average — five percent of all pot smokers each year?) It’s also plausible that an outgrowth of the ever-growing number of cops on the street (and citizens’ increasing number of interactions with them) is inevitably leading to more and more pot arrests. However, regardless of the explanation, it seems remiss for police and politicians not to acknowledge this growing trend and its burdensome fiscal and perhaps even cultural implications.

The bottom line: Since 1990 over 10.4 million Americans — predominantly young people under age 30 — have been busted for pot. Thousands have been disenfranchised, tens of thousands have been unnecessarily sent to “drug treatment,” hundreds of thousands have lost their eligibility for student aid, and perhaps an entire generation (or two) has been alienated to believe that the police are an instrument of their oppression rather than their protection. These are the tangible results of the government’s stepped up war on pot — results that go beyond the FBI’s record numbers, and it’s high time that politicians and the general public began taking notice.

Note: Since 1990, over 10.4 million Americans have been busted for pot. When will we recognize it’s time to stand up to the war on harmless pot smoking?

Paul Armentano is the senior policy analyst for the NORML Foundation in Washington, D.C.

Source: AlterNet (US)
Author: Paul Armentano, AlterNet
Published: October 1, 2007
Copyright: 2007 Independent Media Institute
Contact: letters@alternet.org
Website: http://www.alternet.org/
DL: http://www.alternet.org/drugreporter/63988/

http://www.veteransformedicalmarijuana.org/

No responses yet

Older Posts »